Is there a setting or known limitation I should be aware of so my screener reliably catches every confirmed upcoming earnings date? I rely on this filter to find companies reporting in a specific two-day window, so completeness of the earnings dates is important to me. Thanks for your help.

Hi — I'm using the Stock Screener with a filter on "Next Earnings (Date)" and I think the earnings calendar may be missing some confirmed dates. Specifically: Dave & Buster's (PLAY) has publicly confirmed (in its own June 1, 2026 press release) that it reports Q1 FY2026 earnings on June 15, 2026. But when I filter my screener for Next Earnings Date between 2026-06-15 and 2026-06-16, PLAY does not appear, even though it clears my other filters (market cap over $500M, average volume over 500K). When I look up PLAY directly, what Next Earnings Date does Koyfin show for it? My questions: Why would a company with a confirmed, publicly announced earnings date not surface in a Next Earnings Date screener filter? How current is the earnings-date data in the screener — how often is it refreshed, and does it include companies that have announced but not yet reported? Is there a setting or known limitation I should be aware of so my screener reliably catches every confirmed upcoming earnings date? I rely on this filter to find companies reporting in a specific two-day window, so completeness of the earnings dates is important to me. Thanks for your help.

I would like to suggest adding capability to screen a single stock against criteria setup in My Screens. In this way to would be possible to where the stock screens in/out against each parameter.

In a Koyfin screen, I’m applying a criteria that has no results for that particular metric for 1 or more securities.

If the security would otherwise pass the screen, I would still like to know about it though.

Can you devise an automatic method for doing so?

For example, consider a growth screen consisting the two criteria: “Total Return 3Y (Global R) >99” and “Total Return 1Y (Global R) >99”, which looks for securities in the 100th percentile of Total Returns over both the last 3 years AND the last 1 year.

SEZL is left off this screen, because it is too new to have a 3 year total return. I am happy to have SEZL fail this screen, yet I would still like to know about it so I can make my own determination of its suitability for my use.